top of page

Large-scale government service transformation project (sanitised)

Background

 

A federal government agency initiated a major transformation project in response to legislative reform. The initiative required a complete redesign of their internal case management system, a new public-facing online portal, and a public register. Given the high visibility and legal sensitivity of the services, the agency prioritised delivering a transparent, accessible, and user-friendly experience across all platforms.

Design question

How can we design three integrated systems that effectively blend business needs, user experience principles, and evolving legislative requirements?

Design solution​

  • Online Portal: A public-facing interface for users to interact with the agency.

  • Public Register: A searchable, transparent database aligned with legislative mandates.

  • Internal Case Management System (CMS): A Dynamics-based system optimised for staff efficiency and scalability.

My role 

  • Designing the user experience across all three systems

  • Creating UI for the portal and public register

  • Optimising the CMS interface for increased case volume

  • Uplifting and maintaining the agency’s design system

  • Ensuring WCAG AA compliance across all deliverables

​​​

Approach

My approach is design-led but agile in execution. I focus on understanding the problem, validating early, and designing iteratively in lockstep with development. 

I see UX as a bridge between strategy and delivery - ensuring we're not just building quickly but building the right thing.

Design process

Problem Discovery & Problem Definition

The project kicked off with a compressed timeline and a rapidly evolving legislative landscape. As the sole UX designer, I had to quickly orient myself within a multi-disciplinary team and define a clear path forward.

 

I needed to get clarity on the problem space and user needs before jumping into solutions.

​​

  • Stakeholder Workshops: Conducted workshop with policy advisors, legal teams, frontline staff, and technical leads to understand business goals, legislative constraints, and success metrics.

  • Map Current Experience: Mapped the current experience and identified gaps or friction points.

  • Define Target Users: Developed personas for both internal users (case officers, admin staff) and external users (citizens, legal professionals) to guide design decisions.

Persona Demo-3.png

Persona - corporate lawyer

Define Product Vision ​& Design Artefacts​​

I used the research insights to create design artefacts and align the project team on what "good" design looks like.

I prioritised user problems with the product owner and defined a north-star experience to anchor iterative work.

 

To align the three systems, I created journey maps that visualised:

  • User flows across the online portal, public register, and internal CMS

  • Backstage processes and data handoffs between systems

  • Legislative checkpoints and compliance triggers

  • Pain points and opportunities for streamlining

​​

These artefacts became foundational tools for cross-team alignment and prioritisation across agile sprints. 

Thematic Analysis.png

Thematic analysis of stakeholder feedback

UX Flow Demo-2.png

Portal UX flow

UX Flow Demo-3.png

Forms UX flow

Ideation & Prototyping

I generated multiple ideas through co-design sessions and sketching.  

  • Low-Fidelity Wireframes: Rapid sketches to validate concepts with stakeholders and developers

​​

  • Mid-Fidelity Prototypes: Built in Figma, tailored for each system’s unique needs

    • Portal: Clean, accessible UI with clear calls to action

    • Register: Searchable, filterable interface with legal transparency

    • CMS: Efficiency-focused layout for high-volume case processing

​​

Prototypes were used for sprint demos, stakeholder sign-off, and developer handover.

Untitled_Artwork 2.jpg

Concept sketch for public register

​​​​​​​​Design & Delivery

Once direction was validated, I moved into high-fidelity UI, design systems, and component reuse.​

I worked closely with developers during sprint planning - contributing to backlog refinement to make sure user stories reflect user value.

In agile, handoffs are continuous, not a single event. I often sat in stands or sprint reviews to unblock or clarify.

​​​​​​​​Test, Learn & Iterate

Despite time constraints, I embedded user testing into the delivery cycle where feasible:

  • Remote Testing: Conducted moderated sessions with business users to get feedback

  • UAT: Performed thematic analysis of internal and external user feedback to identify uplifts 

  • Accessibility Audits: Used WCAG AA standards to evaluate colour contrast and ease of navigation

  • Feedback Loops: Incorporated findings into weekly design iterations, balancing usability with legislative fidelity.

If something didn't align with users, we adapted the design - not defend it.

Value Mapping Demo.png

User Feedback Analysis

Contribution & Impact

When I joined the project, design was not part of the delivery lifecycle. Requirements were handed directly from business to development, often accompanied by stakeholder-drawn mockups - one even sketched a UI in Microsoft Paint. There was no user research, no discovery, and no understanding of how to work with a UX designer. My primary contribution was not just designing three integrated systems, it was transforming how the team thought about design.

Before I Joined ​​

  • No UX process in place, requirements went straight from business to dev.

  • Stakeholders provided their own designs (including one drawn in MS Paint).

  • No user research, no discovery, no intentional design decisions.

  • Team unsure how to work with a UX designer.​​

What I Did

truck-solid-full.jpg
book-solid-full.jpg
handshake-solid-full.jpg
bridge-water-solid-full.jpg

Embedded Design into Delivery

  • Introduced a design swimlane in the DevOps board.

  • Ensured every user story was challenged for user value before development.

  • Created UX artefacts (journey maps, wireframes, research summaries) to guide decisions.

Led UX Research with Limited Resources

  • Conducted lean research to uncover pain points in existing systems.

  • Translated insights into actionable design decisions.

  • Worked with the Product Owner to prioritise the product vision from a user perspective.

Uplifted Team Capability

  • Co-created handover processes with BAs, adding wireframes and design annotations to acceptance criteria.

  • Built trust with developers, collaborated through technical constraints, they began seeking design input proactively.

  • Managed stakeholder expectations, educating on UX principles and tech feasibility to achieve design sign-off.

Bridged Strategy and Delivery

  • Acted as a connector between strategic design and delivery teams.

  • Uplifted and maintained the agency’s design system, ensuring WCAG AA compliance.

  • Delivered consistent, scalable design across all three platforms.

Outcome

In just 8 months, I transformed a delivery team unfamiliar with design into one that:

  • Embedded UX into their workflow

  • Made intentional, user-centered decisions

  • Collaborated cross-functionally with trust and efficiency

Design became a strategic asset and not just a final step.

Contact Me

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me via email or phone, or send me a message using the contact form.

Email

tamararosic1@gmail.com

Mobile

(+61) 402466558

bottom of page